> Forest of True Sight > Questions & Answers Reload this Page A Simple Question *deserves* A Simple Answer
Closed Thread
Old Jul 17, 2007, 10:53 AM // 10:53   #1
Academy Page
 
Chunk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Profession: Mo/N
Advertisement

Disable Ads
Exclamation A Simple Question *deserves* A Simple Answer

This is a question directed at the Guild Wars team. It is very simple and I want an answer.

Question:

There are certain towns in Guild Wars that are infested with bots 24 hours a day. (I.E. Granite Citadel) Botters are very easy recognize because they are 55 monk/warriors and follow a specific, repeating path. One only has to observe in-game activity momentarily to discern between bots and real players. Is it not possible for someone from Arena Net to play the game for 1 hour a day and compile a list of character names of suspected botters. Just one person hanging out in the guild wars community could eliminate hundreds of botters a day. Is this method possible or is there some technical reason that human observation is frowned upon by the developers.
Chunk is offline  
Old Jul 17, 2007, 10:57 AM // 10:57   #2
Furnace Stoker
 
Skuld's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Guild: Thousend Tigers Apund Ur Head [Ttgr]
Profession: A/
Default

What makes you think ANet would want to stop botters?
Skuld is offline  
Old Jul 17, 2007, 10:59 AM // 10:59   #3
Wilds Pathfinder
 
God Apprentice's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Profession: Mo/N
Default

This is the most awesome 5,094,761,942 to the second power thread on this topic.

Believe it or not they do monitor, I was in a town one time and a guy talked in the purple gaile chat saying to the idiots not using trade chat "Please use trade chat for all trade purposes."
God Apprentice is offline  
Old Jul 17, 2007, 11:00 AM // 11:00   #4
Academy Page
 
Chunk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Profession: Mo/N
Default

Did the purple chat say anything about botting? Stay on topic.
Chunk is offline  
Old Jul 17, 2007, 11:11 AM // 11:11   #5
Forge Runner
 
Etta's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Mancland, British Empire
Default

I thought you stop playing GW, Chunky Chunk Chunk.
Etta is offline  
Old Jul 17, 2007, 11:16 AM // 11:16   #6
Wilds Pathfinder
 
God Apprentice's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Profession: Mo/N
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chunk
Did the purple chat say anything about botting? Stay on topic.
No but the purple chat was a dev, which means they watch, which is what you wanted to know.
God Apprentice is offline  
Old Jul 17, 2007, 11:21 AM // 11:21   #7
Academy Page
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Guild: Ex Talonis
Profession: Mo/
Default

Quote:
Is it not possible for someone from Arena Net to play the game for 1 hour a day and compile a list of character names of suspected botters.
Are you kidding me? They'll never get level 70 in WoW if they're busy playing this game.
kurtas is offline  
Old Jul 17, 2007, 11:22 AM // 11:22   #8
Krytan Explorer
 
Renegade26's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Profession: R/
Default

300 bots a day.
Renegade26 is offline  
Old Jul 17, 2007, 11:25 AM // 11:25   #9
Academy Page
 
Chunk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Profession: Mo/N
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by God Apprentice
No but the purple chat was a dev, which means they watch, which is what you wanted to know.
No disrespect, but that is heresay on your part. I want an official Arena-Net response of why common sense steps are not being taken to eliminate the botting infestation.
Chunk is offline  
Old Jul 17, 2007, 11:25 AM // 11:25   #10
Forge Runner
 
Iuris's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Guild: Crazy ducks from the Forest
Profession: W/
Default

First, Chunk, if you really want an answer, ask Anet. Don't post on a forum where it may, or may not, catch the eye of a passing by Anet employee.

If you want to discuss, though, here's a bit:
Anet only has so many people to do the work. And there's a lot of work competing for resources. Nothing can be done instantly, and things get some priorities. Mass lag in Germany directly affecting players is a bit more important than botting, which only affects the players in an indirect way (Guesstimate, BTW).

Second, with thousands of bot accounts banned each month, Anet seems to be doing something. However, all a botter needs is go and buy new keys to start anew. It's a hydra type fight. Why not doing more? See above.

You must realize that detecting a bot is not quite as simple as it seems. It takes time, observation, and not just in town but also in the instance.
Iuris is offline  
Old Jul 17, 2007, 12:24 PM // 12:24   #11
Lion's Arch Merchant
 
Muspellsheimr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Default

More or less what he said ^ ^ ^

However, most of the bot accounts are stolen, not bought by the botters.

Oh, and their was a thread by Gaile about this a while back. If the Guru search ever begins to work, I *might* be able to find it for you.
Muspellsheimr is offline  
Old Jul 17, 2007, 12:32 PM // 12:32   #12
Furnace Stoker
 
Mournblade's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Houston, Texas
Guild: Dawn Treaders [DAWN]
Profession: W/Mo
Default

Gaile has claimed 300 bots per day are banned and she seemed pleased with that number. I predict that if she does post in this thread, it will be to reaffirm this information.

You get bonus points though for making it clear you had quit the game, and then showing up a couple months later demanding answers that had already been given from the dev team. GG
Mournblade is offline  
Old Jul 17, 2007, 12:33 PM // 12:33   #13
Ascalonian Squire
 
Xitoahc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: NYC
Guild: Kingdom of the Sixth Aspect [KSA]
Profession: R/
Default

Quote:
In June, the Support Teams found, researched, verified and banned 9,009 bots. In July, they are already approaching 4,000 banned bots. As you can see, they're getting very good at this, and in nearly all cases, there is no appeal or the appeal is not supported by the facts upon undertaking a re-check. So we're making very good headway. You should be assured that the team visually checks at least 10 "hot spots for bots." Two of them are indeed Altruum Ruins and Granite Citadel, so they are very much on target. --Gaile
http://wiki.guildwars.com/wiki/Talk:Bot

Official Word from Anet like you wanted Chunky.
Xitoahc is offline  
Old Jul 17, 2007, 01:41 PM // 13:41   #14
Hall Hero
 
Bryant Again's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Etta
I thought you stop playing GW, Chunky Chunk Chunk.
And so therefore, he does not have a right to have a general concern over the game?
Bryant Again is offline  
Old Jul 17, 2007, 01:43 PM // 13:43   #15
Wilds Pathfinder
 
lucifer_uk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Nottingham, England
Guild: The Venerable Truth [TvT] The Venerable Alliance [TvH] [TvL]
Profession: R/
Default

Please try use the search feature.

The was a post about bots being discussed literally 1 day ago and Gaile even posted in it:

http://www.guildwarsguru.com/forum/s...php?t=10177588
lucifer_uk is offline  
Old Jul 17, 2007, 01:45 PM // 13:45   #16
Forge Runner
 
Redfeather1975's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Apartment#306
Guild: Rhedd Asylum
Profession: Me/
Default

As it's been said Gaile commented on the number of bots banned a day and that people from Anet pop into the 'hot spots' often to watch bot activity.
Xitoahc's link to the wiki shows that close to 400 bots a day are being banned in July!
Redfeather1975 is offline  
Old Jul 17, 2007, 08:06 PM // 20:06   #17
Wilds Pathfinder
 
TwinRaven's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Profession: W/
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Iuris
First, Chunk, if you really want an answer, ask Anet. Don't post on a forum where it may, or may not, catch the eye of a passing by Anet employee.
Sorry to say it, but if you tried sending a note to ANet on such a subject, you would be likely to be referred to the forums...It happens a lot. ANet has sent a few of us an e-mail saying to post concerns here....and for the record: ANet is pretty good about looking at the forums. They may not adequately address every issue according to some folks, but they DO read over the topics and postings here....especially this forum. In the immortal words of Robert A Ripley..."Believe it or not"
TwinRaven is offline  
Old Jul 17, 2007, 08:18 PM // 20:18   #18
Forge Runner
 
lennymon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Seattle
Guild: Odin's Hammer [OH] - Servant's of Fortuna [SoF]
Profession: R/
Default

@op it's possible, and they do it (according to them - whom I'd believe)

also @op re your title: working hard *deserves* a decent living but does that always happen?

Regarding the topic at large
Anet folks don't *need* to get rid of bots... don't need to tell us anything about it, and certainly don't need to get crapped on about what you, me or anyone else thinks about how they do what they do. I certainly don't need to know about what they do, rather nice that they are kind enough to tell us stuff don't you think? If you wanna get all wanky with Anet don't do it on guru please (just my personal request).
lennymon is offline  
Old Jul 18, 2007, 07:13 AM // 07:13   #19
Furnace Stoker
 
Coloneh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Profession: D/W
Default

stop complaining. are the bots hurting you? no. are the hurting the economy? no. leave em alone, what a-net is doing is working fine.
Coloneh is offline  
Old Jul 18, 2007, 07:47 AM // 07:47   #20
Frost Gate Guardian
 
shanaya's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Guild: Scouts of Tyria
Profession: R/
Default

If the botters are buying new accounts (rather than stealing them) after they are banned then Anet is making a nice bit of revenue from them.
shanaya is offline  
Closed Thread


Share This Forum!  
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes


All times are GMT. The time now is 02:37 PM // 14:37.